Rather than narrow our definition of impact, we should use metrics to explore richness and diversity of outcomes.
Via Mark E. Deschaine, PhD
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Pavlos Nomikos's curator insight,
October 6, 2013 12:44 PM
"Morale of the story: Whether or not you think SEO is good or bad and whether you think it is going to die or not, one thing stands certain for the near future: SEO specialists will have a much harder time proving that what they do actually works. Period."
David Bennett's curator insight,
October 11, 2013 6:34 AM
Quote from Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land: " Publishers allow search engines to index their content, which is used by the search engines as the core content they can put lucrative ads around. In return, search engines have provided traffic to publishers and data on how those publishers are found. That latter part of the ‘deal’ was unilaterally pulled by Google.”""
Deb Nystrom, REVELN's curator insight,
October 16, 2013 9:40 PM
Robin Good's insight with this ScoopIt is plenty. It's a big deal about SEO being worthwhile, a real game changer as of Sept. 25th. ~ Deb
Jeff Domansky's curator insight,
January 16, 2013 3:29 PM
Valuable reading and social marketing analysis from Marty Smith... |
|
Agree, the web is complex. We need metrics that help sort the wheat from the chaff.