Internet of Things - Technology focus
42.9K views | +2 today
Follow
Internet of Things - Technology focus
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Richard Platt from Venture Capital Stories
Scoop.it!

VCs Making Data Security a Funding Factor

VCs Making Data Security a Funding Factor | Internet of Things - Technology focus | Scoop.it

Never mind risk vs. reward or strength of management, venture capitalists are turning an analytical eye to data security issues when evaluating potential investments, according to Margaret Utterback of Quarles & Brady. For evidence of this shift, look no further than Andreessen Horowitz’s hire of Ted Ullyot, the former general counsel of Facebook, to a key role at the VC shop.

“Data security—and possible data breaches—are now such significant business concerns that VCs couldn’t do responsible due diligence if they didn’t consider security issues when performing valuation analyses,” Utterback says. For instance, if the target company hasn’t been storing data correctly, funders will factor potential liability and bad press into their valuations.

Conversely, companies creating technology that can mitigate and prevent cybersecurity breaches are getting big bucks from VCs. According to Sam Pfeifle of The Privacy Advisor, the messaging service Confide, which had a strong privacy focus from the start, has been inundated with VC interest.


Via Marc Kneepkens
Richard Platt's insight:

“Data security—and possible data breaches—are now such significant business concerns that VCs couldn’t do responsible due diligence if they didn’t consider security issues when performing valuation analyses,” Utterback says. For instance, if the target company hasn’t been storing data correctly, funders will factor potential liability and bad press into their valuations.

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Richard Platt from Pitch it!
Scoop.it!

Know your Minimum Winning Game for startup success

Know your Minimum Winning Game for startup success | Internet of Things - Technology focus | Scoop.it
It's surprising how frequently entrepreneurs struggle when potential investors ask them a simple question: "What are you going to accomplish with this round of financing?"

At XSeed Capital we are introduced to over 500+ new startup opportunities every year, and we directly meet or talk to 150–200 of these companies. In this context, I am sometimes asked what is the “biggest mistake” that a CEO or management team makes when pitching venture capitalists. While there are several that come to mind, I remain surprised at how frequently even experienced entrepreneurs struggle with a simple question:

“What are you going to accomplish with this round of financing?”

In an unexpectedly large number of conversations and meetings, instead of hearing proposed measurable milestones, investors are given a “to do” list of activities from entrepreneurs: hire some engineers, launch the first product, get some revenue, do some marketing, etc.

In a world of staged funding rounds, an idea that my Stanford colleague, Robert Burgelman, and I wrote about in 2007 can provide entrepreneurs with a way to think about how they should contemplate what needs to be achieved with each infusion of capital and the size of the round they are raising: the Minimum Winning Game (MWG). Read more: click image or title.




Need funding?

Get your Free Business Plan Template here: http://bit.l/1aKy7km


Via Marc Kneepkens
Richard Platt's insight:

Exceptional advice not only for startups but also large corporations as well that have their own business building activities internal to their organizations.  I have been long time supporter of MWG theory, along with the Porter 5 Plus model and the Strategic Inflection Point elements that make up the broader theory.  In contrast to the MVP model of the Lean Start-Up as promoted by others in Silicon Valley and elsewhere, which I see from my p.o.v. as a much smaller subset of what MWG theory propositions, necessary perhaps but insufficient in the kind of analysis and forethought required.  (In full disclosure I am ex-Intel, and specifically helped drive innovation across the enterprise and saw how MWG theory (when applied correctly) is a  better than other approaches to what we've seen different managers, groups, organizations inside of Intel as well as in other high tech firms.)

No comment yet.